Origin: The Organic Cell

Powereality Search Engine

Custom Search

In the annals of history philosophy has been a will to power, a will to order. In the contemporary time period activities of individuals of repute have concerted their collective forces to beheld as a power. The manifest political agenda of the movers in question have yielded an unparalleled act of censorship that is singularly unique in the history of mankind.

The will to order, civilization, is one of Empire, Mobilization of Empire and Civilization. Hitherto it may be made known as MOEC.

Mankind's historic past describes kingdoms that arose without knowledge of where or how. But man has desired a study of all that was to be known of history by a corresponding level; a system.

Thus Man (Cambridge Law School) then did take to will his self and mankind to civilization. He then did take to write the Particular History and Justice. This material was derived from the Great University, from the colleges comprised from it and the perfection of everything known by it's highest good, of the demonstrable sciences, math, the arts and letters, as well as the schools of law and medicine.

All this knowledge did this Man have at his disposable to form the civilization from the creation of man's knowledge, himself to the future state

In this perspective was knowledge of powerful teachers of religion and their advents. There was also to be taken into consideration of the scientist and his demonstrable efficient operation. Then and last there were the laws great they were to order man and his government to his good.

This period of silence, censorship, does gave a discernible point of origin. Such embodies a will of a first mover and this Man had many accomplices to embody a force of many wills. This activity formed an in continuo emergent field of study.

I am not totally cognizant of the precise date of the beginning. I know by what I have testimony of by my self and my will.

The system's method and chronological order I only may deduce. Through pragmatism the accuracy of investigation and documentation of events that did occur, the clarification of the true moral and legal intent of the movers may be discerned.

For the sake of one I would have proposed God first but I will present an example from the demonstrable sciences as logic will give continuity whereas the particular theistic tradition only contradiction, as I hold the latter actually greater the love of such is more and might cloud one's mind of the true conception of this event.

I will here interject for the grace of the lector a model of Aristotle is presented to facilitate the organization of Particular History and Justice.

Paradigm of Laws

I. The Eternal Law

II. The Natural Law

III. The Positive Law

The Eternal Law is the mind of the Ruler Supreme equating to Divine Government thus binding the living being to final salvation and judgment.

The Natural Law is the law of nature proper, of Mother Nature as some have called her. This according to the theologian concludes that intelligence and consciousness are limited by contact with matter by man's birth in nature. The gift of intelligence, reason, must be used to elevate oneself to an understanding of the Eternal Law.

The scientist does not accept this metaphysical position as this pertains to the Eternal Law. The scientist will accept only what is fully demonstrable. This is also an argumentative process of the natural reason which can be stated in equivalence to the natural law as has been done by other great masters as Aquinas.

The Positive Law is the human law. It is the great constitutions of man, governments both theistic and secular, written and promulgated for all by the sovereign.

The thinking being such, if there is a spiritual right, there is a natural right. If there is a natural right there needs be a law to protect it. This should be kept whole and conserved by the law and held cumulatively. This is as the legal right of the commonwealth. These spiritual rights, these natural rights become the positive having been set forth in the great constitutions that have risen by will of God or man's own.

This morality, hence the giving up of some freedom by one individual to the many to preserve the freedom, rights that existed in the state of nature and spiritual creation, (theistic and metaphysical if the debate permits) is a right protected by a law, a series of laws as adequate in the positive constitutions.

This was information was studied and heard by Man whom compiled such into Particular History and Justice.

To be complete in one's activity man needs a moral proposition to one's mental and physical activity to it's final end.

As stated the three stated laws comprise the essence of the consequent laws. Man has historically claimed perfection in consciousness, intelligence, relative to one or all in the erecting of the state.

This precludes the necessity of another model, one of constitutions which is predominately Aristotelian in it's origin.

Classical Tyranny









Kings have claimed descendency from God to rule, this within their own demonstration or the sanction of the priesthood. This is the rule of the best man.

The aristocracy having laid a claim to rule by virtue of the qualification of having the best births, education, and so forth, the familiar histories of service, members inclusive of peerage, legislators, lawyers, doctors, owners of land, business, and the priesthood; this wealth excludes them from the temptation to abuse power. Such are the claims of the aristocracy to power.

The democrat's claim lies in freedom. As men seem to be spawned of a similar birthing, they are all equal. If man was equal at his birthing, then all men are equal. If man was equal at his birthing, he is equal in all things. If he is equal in the greatest thing, man's freedom, than he shall be equal in all things similar. This democrats claim to know greater. The fact that the minds of many men are greater than the minds of a few or one man add to the claims the democrats make to rule.

To begin earnestly in this argument is to order a will, to begin a mobilization. One may establish their claims to rule and choose the intellectual model practical.

A moral claim to rule may be pure. If this is the case it is orthodox, usually a theistic argument but not necessarily true. This argument is basically deemed to be infallible in the strictest definition. Once revealed it is held to be true and not subject to revision.

A moral claim to rule may be mixed. It may contain theistic as well as scientific arguments. It may be amendable. This claim contains a revisionist tendency. This lends a greater credence to revolution. In the particular case the latter was taken in regards to the former.

The present stage of censorship exists within a claim to rule. This evolves a will to empire, a will contained within a mobilization. The verbal paradigm will be presented in the following for simplicity. Control is the outer boundary of the cell.

Mobilization of Empire and Civilization

Origin: The Organic Cell

Origin contains seven subsystems under and including Control which is the suprasystem. Any other presentation would be editorial or of other researchers and not that of Cambridge. Their work would be a Reiterated Version of Prisoner's Dilemma.


Particular History
and Justice





Ideal State -
Varna Asrama

Origin Reiterated Model

The Origin Reiterated Model was not in the first Origin paper. It is a researcher's tools to balance the skewing that is in the work of the Membership in the first Origin model. Note that I do not consider Origin to be an a priori government existing in Natural Law.


Particular History and Justice










Ideal State - Varna Asrama

Mobilization involves the conceptualization of the new regime. This is non structural and has form in it's spiritual state a theory of a pure of a pure state, the perfect regime to guarantee the perfection of the regime perpetually.

This state is pure and remains undisturbed and is non differentiated of it's spiritual quality although a diversity of duty may appear present

Descending from the perfect regime are schematica that exist perfectly but only within their own nature.

Thus sovereignty has components as thus:

1. Head of State - His close advisers

2. Legislative Body - Judicial Body - Constitution - Body Politic - Government

3. Citizens and other members within the state

The will to empire is erected implemented in two ways that of an absolute morality and that of a relative morality.

The absolute morality proper is one according to the wise, I shall use an example from Scipio, as a morality that will not change from time to time place to place, or person to person

Hence in it's strongest conception it is founded by God and revealed to man it equates to eternal government. It is orthodox, atheistic science and unchanging but is empirically scientific.

The relative position is founded on the morality of a common good but hinges more on human customs and traditions. These do appear to change from time to time, place to place, and person to person

A relative claim to rule may argues as one that changes from time to time, place to place, and person to person. This can be genuinely be noted in the discussion of slavery.

A man is a slave in a chronological period in history, in a chronological period in history, is freed, is a slave in one country but if he can escape and flee to another country he enjoys freedom. He is a slave to one man, but is always free to another.

In this way a relative system argues a morality that comes into existence has some evolution for man's betterment. This work but not exclusively is relegated to the science of the theologian, moralist, philosopher, and legislator. As seen this is amendable. Through the trajectory of time this has given rise to a theory of secular humanism.

The other postulation that is to be dealt with which will enhance to define all is the question of free will and it's opposite argument scientific determinism.

The free will argument is championed by the theistic as well as the scientific encampment to some extent. Simply put free will states that a man chooses to act. This can be expressed as being and non being. It is conceptualized in these relations:

God's Will

Man willing unto God

Man willing upon oneself

Man willing unto one's neighbor

Man willing unto the cosmos (environment)

Being coming into being

The model of the state will embody in it's absolute and theistic form the will of God. The state will embody the morality drawn from the natural law if such is absolute and materially scientific.

In it's relative model the state will embody the following principles but with theistic influence more tempered and possibly separated from the civil state. Morality is formed drawn from the minds of the previously stated leading men according to the common good and it's preservation.

Scientific determinism proper is extended from, but in reality is part of the study of materialism. It is part of the current theory that governs the teaching of most modern education.

It is stated that all matter existing in the three dimensional world exists in space and time, has a definite point of origin, and has some final end or dissolution according to the laws of nature.

For simplicity's purpose, number theories, and other operations can be deduced with one hundred percent accuracy. Similar proofs have bound science and other branches of knowledge to a strict scientific determinism.

The implications for the fields of medicine and psychology are that they are bound to argue deterministically of the origin of life from inorganic elements; hence the facilitation of the reduction of all things to matter. Mathematics helps provide the empirical evolution of knowledge to perfection as scientific determinism.

The psychologist and medical practitioner must be able to predict the birth, growth, actual thinking, as well as choices made by an individual until the taking of death. This includes the choice of criminality. These events must be predictable in the strictest absolute sense in the controlled efficient operation of a scientist. One has to predict choices and events of individuals to that of nationstates as scientist controls elements eat every step of an experiment to it's final demonstrable conclusion.

Hence, the next great question has now arisen. Is man free to choose? If he is he is guilty of a bad choice if he is guilty of a bad choice, if he is not he is insane and less guilty as morality has taught us.

The great priests teach us that to a Christian and similar traditions, man chooses, providence leaves history undetermined. To the Vedic Scientist man chooses but one's karma which are one's materialistic activities are deterministic.

These are the choices to be made in theory of the Perfect State.

The Mobilization of Empire and Civilization will choose to argue and act upon the rigors of scientific determinism.

MOEC will argue history completely predictable in it's ultimate perfection.

This analization and judgment transcends nationalities and supranationalities as well as the individual. MOEC's choice was beyond good and evil.

In it's heart lies it modus operandi. It is one of defection. There are two positions and there can only be two; that of the constitutionalists and the anarchist (violent). The constitutionalists invokes change only by a constitutional method, this within all logic and reason. War is jus belle.

The anarchist (violent) basically strives for legitimacy but when squared may resort to violence in one's irrationality. To achieve his political ends, extra legal activities equate to the obtaining of the good.

This is simple and truthful. The constitutional individual shall not lose to the irrationalist whose deviance is rooted in evil, the violent act. This should be brought to light and the irrationalist and his position defeated.

This is achieved by the constitutionalist and by constitution, the deviant returned to civilization.

This is a claim but truthfully a challenge to the perpetrator of violent acts.

I shall now present a letter that has been written to a spiritual master placing the dilemma.

My respectful obeisances Hridayananda,

I am respectfully writing you today to ask for instructions in the aiding myself in the maturing of my devotional service.

I have heard that when a situation where a combination of the modes of nature, or just one, sattya, raja, or tama predominate a particular area or building, it is beneficial if qualified Brahmins are sent into restore or neutralize the imbalance by re establishing the Vaishnava principles and Vedic civilization.

In regards to this knowledge I would prefer if you would explain the use of defection.

Currently all nationstates, supranational organizations, the UN, as well as the lower level sovereigns (legally sanctioned) live in a state of anarchy, order, and constraints. The international relations are more in anarchy with rule by positive law held in a minimum of norms of theoretical laws and a small level of supranational regimes by positive law

The reciprocation of nationstates and regimes uses defection to promote interests and seems to promote interests of policy of a particular group or alignment over the constitutional sovereignty of one independent actor.

One interest seems to predominate by hegemony or it's alignment. The levels of sovereignty that are weaker defect to one or more sides in anarchic patterns that defy rationality and law. This multilateral, bilateral, unilateral relationship, third party conflict is support for the systematic patterns of defection that lead to war.

As one or more interests expands it's regime or it's will to empire or exert authority, at a lower level actors to take corresponding positions that cause defection to occur at levels of heads of state to the average citizens including devotees.

For a person whose only interest is to develop pure devotional service, the problem now brings is that conflicts become unavoidable and the coercive general will or force of law moves upon these actors to defect, to reciprocate with the regimes that are stronger willed.

The result in this escalated conflict is the actor often compromise laws and moral (spiritual) standards. There is no sovereign authority to implicate belligerents at the international level. They go on unprosecuted.

At the lower level, regimes have defected in this billiard ball effect, have yielded to force and have implicated themselves in the positive law.

My question I would like to postulate is what is the devotee's position in rendering service to guru and Sampradaya?

Can or can he not defect to regimes and will in support of these in regards to national and local authorities in measures that these imply or directly break statutes? The greater consideration being there are citizens and properties under states and governors.

I would like to refer to John 10, King James Version 5: 10: 8 "All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep do not hear them."

John 10: 10 "The thief comes not but for to steal and to kill and to destroy. I am come that they might have life and have to more abundantly for the sheep."

John 10: 14 "I am the good shepherd and know my sheep and are known by them."

John 10: 16 "And other sheep I have which are not of this fold. Them I also must bring and there shall be one shepherd."

John 10: 17 "Therefore doth my father love me because I lay down for my life for sheep."

Is an explanation now needed of sanatana dharma? Is the conclusion of the devotee and non devotee bound to reciprocate with authority both spiritual and mortal? That to defect means one should have strict adherence to spiritual and legal precepts and to not take an option under the sway of force. How does the devotee choose? What is the position of the devotee who has no knowledge of it's science? What obligation does guru have in regards to Sri Krishna, the Sampradaya, the world, and all living entities in general?

Is being duty bound and legally bound the case for all?

Your humble servant,

Bhakta David Nollmeyer

The modus operandi has now been presented in systematic patterns of defection. A presentation of a universal model for analysis has been attempted and in combination will render objective results for structuralist politics and similar theory.

Defection is the primary structural support for MOEC and Mobilization. It will be seen as an active principle to the obtaining of the future state and beyond. Systematic patterns of defection are the means to the end.

(In the Artificial Virus PHJ actually is within Control which is the cell wall. In truth to assemble the defection model PHJ or incorporating a database of history to justify or avenge would come first before emergent subsystems. (DWN Westwood CA July 8, 2009 to Weed CA June 30, 2015)

The writing of The Particular History and Justice was a product of the research of Man in complying knowledge of the great University. History is the scientific documentation of events and begins at it's point of origin.

The proposition of the Particular History and Justice is to form an accurate database in an historical form to define a morality that lays claim to an empire. What has been done is that various claims to creation, the evolution, and the history of life specifically are compiled. These histories are what are acceptable to theistic religions and science. The contradictions must be reconciled in ordering of the perfect regime. This in an equitable manner would be Justice.

The database of PHJ in practical real terms is a base of material to be an ad hominem support in the physical structure of individuals, nationstates, and supranational regimes that comprises a civilization.

The conditions of MOEC's existence predicate that this is not the only valid possible outcome.

Every event in recorded memory has had a direct or indirect bearing on the present or will in the future.

If the correct truth is made in the documentation and the truth is strictly adhered to in implementation, the implementation in all regards shall lay a formidable claim to equality, setting aside all past condition ad hominem.

The Particular History and Justice is a subsystem in the organization of the Mobilization of Empire and Civilization.

In the implementation of the police surveillance state, conditioning will be used to introduce behaviors to an individual. This precludes that MOEC is indeed a system of distributive justice. This activity is from a standpoint of absolute morality, deterministic but with free will. There is then the state (MOEC), police force and the agents.

There is a theoretical standpoint of prediction events in the lifespan of the human being. These shall form the functional imperative of a hierarchical goal in the individual's life within society.

The individual it free to choose or reject the behaviors presented in the establishing of identity in the strictest scientific determinism standpoint, the overall psychical position of the individual is predicted with primary and secondary corollary outcomes.

The schema is to be replicated in all humans and other beings as the advanced animals. These activities are performed with an object of institutionalizing the process of conditioning an individual in the socialization of the entire civilization. MOEC shall order mankind towards an end judgment.

In every conception of existence there is on origin and primary movers, agents and object.

The point of origin and primary mover may be spiritual it may be material.

MOEC would like to reconcile the myriad propositions which have been revealed and proposed throughout history.

Simple arguments inclusive of this case are the a priori standpoint of Godhead as origin and primary mover.

The argument of whether there is a monotheistic or polytheistic nature in his being and creation arises. In this light, what is the entity's relationship to this sovereign?

In this concept of God, space would be eternal on the question of matter. Science holds that matter is matter is a mass in motion in spacetime. For simplicity, the linkage of metaphysics and physics is sought in a diligent labor from the best sources. This argument is further researched as the mind body problem. These topics shall be ordered in a scientific deterministic format with a metaphysical first mover. The concept of sanatana dharma has been used by MOEC in an attempt to develop it's presentation as a revelation of an eternal religion.

Control is the subsystem of MOEC that dominates the apparatus. MOEC may be seen as a social system; one of control.

In review, deity has moved his will across the creation. Thusly he is it's origin, creator, master, or controller. In the Vedic system all entities are secondary controllers with minute authority over environs. In conjunction the psychical apparatus or mind is localized within a hierarchical structure of living entities. The gift of intelligence is extended to the living for correct usage.

The positive law and head of state are the authority of political systems that control the earth of our existence. In MOEC's political philosophy a theocracy is preferred.

In this manner, all living entities are accounted for from single celled entities to humans in our conception of spacetime. In conclusions of authorized authorities of religion, deity exists in an eternity in upper higher dimensional space not subject to time. A non differentiated kingdom with form and diversity may also exist.

From an individual's birth one wills some type of activity towards various objects. MOEC will argue such from conception. In this endeavor the individual or living entity elevates or degrades one's being and environ into some conception of order.

In essence spirit is primary but for the conditioned entity, objects as sense data approach the mind, are processed through the senses and become datum thus forming a material conception of existence in lieu of a spiritual identity. There is a conflict between authority and objects.

In this schema man is reciprocating with a sovereign deity. This entails a divine or eternal configuration and lower hierarchies that have been explained. The inconsistency in this reciprocation sets forward a pattern of causation that must occur. MOEC is a configuration of free will and scientific determinism. Matter has a distinct deterministic pattern. If the origin is known, the primary mover, secondary mover, agents, and object or terminus, all corollary outcomes may be measured infinitum.

Does man's will choose? The current moral conception taught at the scholastic level is scientific determinism and is making inroads in many areas of discussion. The environment is fraught with dueling with one side attempting to throw the issue into the air once again after discovery. The inconsistency in moral boundary locations predisposes a set of controlling entities hierarchical in a kingdom highest to lowest.

As man evolves his consciousness individually and collectively, one implements a religious socio political system; and imposes such over civilization. MOEC argues the universe a priori. Does the universe function in an orderly manner independent of man's experience? MOEC argues under natural laws, yes, there is an existing support in deduction. What exists in man's mind does have an existence. Man's knowledge singularly reflects one's vanity and dubious limitation in categorizing phenomena.

For simple purposes, a consultation of doctrine on original sin or fall from grace could be sighted for more support. Authorization is an important component free of personal motivation in MOEC.

The purely atheistic interpretations of scientific determinism are an important aspect as well as MOECs seeks harmonization of the two. This is automatically induction or ex posteriori. One cannot violate the other lest there be duplicity. The trajectory of civilization involves a problematic of ordered wills to a common or uncommon good. The contention of theism and schism are important factors as man concludes his species life.

In the pursuit of knowledge, the pursuit of power, man has tried to configure a perfect system to rule. This actually has spawned a world history that has failed.

As the continuum of revelation and knowledge progresses, privation and miserliness evolve into deviance. A crime multiplier is formed from simple misdemeanors to murder. The crime multiplier is the foundation to war. Genocide and EWS as Armageddon Theory may be placed over the constitutional model.

The establishment of the Apollonian cult is now postulated. It is to be remembered that the word Apollo may be used universally as Godhead or identification of the personal Godhead.

In a broad sense most religions hold that there is an absolute Godhead of which man rebelled or doubted and hence fell lost his spirit and grace. Theism argues that man chooses free from coercion from Godhead.

As man and civilization progress factions form around various deities and truths. MOEC argues that man may irrationally choose and cause schism. This value judgment is then shared by persons collectively forming a culture. MOEC will argue more primarily that they are entrapped tacitly with false ideas and behaviors that lead to their unworldliness and punishment.

This pattern evolves downward from religion to single celled entities in the artificial competition between species. The Apollonian cult is superior; Dionysian inferior to be purged at the Bacchanals. If this schema is fulfilled there are only Dionysian cults only.

The archetypal pattern of Armageddon Theory is now established. The predisposition of man has formed; the sovereign and subject relation. There is a universal archetypal pattern of theocracy, monarchy, aristocracy, and polity in evolution worldwide in a trajectory through history. These models in the general sense reflect theory and not absolute concrete fact. The downfall of civilization is also predicted in a sequence of ages, gold, silver, bronze, and iron.

MOEC has formed the PHJ for it's data and genetic base with a criterion of defection plus informant ratio for all holon. This activity is predicated on the existential value of objects in nature. The evolution of the universe is natural with MOEC arguing the environment as a reflection of the being and vice versa. The informant ratio is the negative ratio of one's activity plus one's ability to avoid legal prosecution and extra legal events. Legal structures are built from the informant ratio as houses, businesses, and constitutions.

A small model will be presented that is a reflection of the whole of extralegal schema. Two individuals have activities involving drug contraband. One is rated as six. One is rated as a four. A transaction is arranged with TPSYS. Number six is the connection. The deal is a ten kilogram purchase of contraband at number six's home.

A municipality is the spatial area. The two members are also part of other dyads tryads and other grouping in the area. These sets of persons are attached historically to the original lawyers in the past. This is PHJ and these strands help support the conditioning of individuals. There are other persons who deal at the same or greater informant ratios (6:4) and similar amounts of contraband. A comparison and accurate legal analysis would reveal some persons to yield a greater threat and others lesser in prosecution. The location of the transactions plays an important part in this perspectivism.

MOEC has shown intent, rationality, and wills, orders, secondary movers, and agents to fulfill the object, viz. conditioning. This manner of entrapment is a form of justice with a similar informant ratio. Some individuals with similar acts are not arrested this day; this transaction resulted in an arrest.

The whole trajectory of sense data codified into PHJ is the ad hominem support inclusive of sets to implement an arrest. A six and four ratio is ten and has occurred in a distinct chronological time and location within a boundary. Hence number six will win. A number seven and four will not be arrested. Eventually the informant ratios will involve the police, prosecutors, and judges who are part of the so called de jure system.

This phenomena is an attempt to rationally explain a subjective event of discretion. Ratios appear to be invented when needed as they case may be. If there is a scenario developed it is attempted to be adhered to. With or without cognition individuals defect to MOEC. MOEC will attempt to educate and arrange economy for individuals from PHJ.

MOEC is unequal in regards to equal protection. The scheme of idol, hero, buffoon, and scapegoat emerges within a lottery. MOEC has influence over persons from world leaders to homeless persons. As deviance incurs these holons are seen as agents that evolve a hierarchy descending from Cleopatra and Hitler ad infinitum to the sole survivor.

In review, genocide and war are the most deviant crimes. Murder assault, rape, robbery and drug trafficking and intoxication as all crimes descend into worldliness. Atheism is deemed negative but some moral atheists may be deemed to have some legitimacy over ritualistic theists.

The target operation for Lycurgus is contraband followed by gaming and prostitution. Hence the so called libertarian vices are focalized.

As numerical informant ratios combine in spacetime, a war or genocide incurs. MOEC will orchestrate the movement of the agents, the actors, totally attempting to predict the outcome. MOEC, as new equilibriums emerge draws nationalities, treaties, and convenes war crime courts with their expertise.

The Aural Cartographic Maps may be reduced to numbers, digits, and bytes, to a form of weighted law. This is the informant ratio that predicates a certain outcome legal or extralegal.

As MOEC moves to condition an individual imposing the ratios over all objects that exist in a particular culture, does that person deterministically or freely choose? This act is also in regards to MOEC and it's agents. The rigours of a systematic operant conditioning are in contestation.

The numbers, weighted law are ordered into the future; a composite of End World Scenarios EWS emerge. The preferred is Armageddon Theory. Most theistic traditions proclaim the coming of a messianic figure or Godhead himself to deliver mankind.

Who will be promoted to Godhead? All the possible levels of sets have been ordered into PHJ. The conditioning is being fulfilled by TPSYS. Within this material is the substance for a judgment phase where all crimes are ordered into species. Latin is used but existence is existence in MOEC Theory.

Cleopatra and Hitler are chosen to perpetuate MOEC under a relative morality to diffuse personality development by scaling value judgments in half progressively. MOEC conditions individuals creating a differentiated personality.

The hierarchy of the crime multiplier has been presented and improperly ordered acts result in individuals to be rated against the assumed marriage of Cleopatra and Hitler.

MOEC finds that the subjective orchestration or entrapment is the only manner to predict an individual's behavior accurately. The world is a stage, a theatre. MOEC's science is ahead of what is publicly acknowledged. Hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanoes and lightening strikes have been predicted. MOEC is revealing that the government and science are more advanced in the areas determinism than is held by public opinion.

MOEC successfully predicted Mt. St. Helen, Hurricanes Andrew and Bertha recently. Even more interesting is the accuracy of predicting lightening strikes against an exact individual. This appears absurd but there is a tradition of doing such that is several hundred years old. Such is predicted on the exact dates using science, statistics, probabilities, and conditioning.

The position of MOEC is atheistic absolute morality, one at least of the sanctity of life. The best deterministic outcome is based on proofs of laws, particularly the use of natural law to support the existence of Godhead as a person. Ideally MOEC is vegan, anti hate, anti Nazi, anti abortion, anti euthanasia, and anti nuclear. Positions on death are at times muddled depending more on the security of it's agents. I argue that MOEC is conservative. The authors appear to have been originally pro death but moved to an abolitionist posture that was and is a growing trend. The above are abstracts. The TPSYS running the operation may have totally opposite positions. As functions these inputs should yield marginally better efficiency over the long term.

There is an equifinality on these issues in the following subsystem, Atomization.

Technology involves the efficiency of all things. The design by courts to permit pornography and hate on the web computer systems allows for individuals to will what MOEC considers to deviant as an expression of freedom. The problematic involves a trajectory in spacetime. Individuals will upon objects within the creation inclusive of themselves. These contradictions logically support MOEC's de facto nature of recruiting informants to perform illicit acts and retaining such as scapegoats instead of prosecuting corrupt officials. MOEC is attempting to be the Judge of history and mankind.

MOEC has stated it's line. MOEC has arranged Lycurgus Akbar from the United Kingdom and the United States as to the consummate expansion of totalitarianism. MOEC believes it can deify itself into a religion. In reality this is the systematic loss of rights to the state predicated on numerical informant ratios that are contrived, creating a crime multiplier, and genocidal warfare. MOEC's interest will divide and fragment unity in the human family setting the stage for nuclear accidents, nuclear terror, and limited nuclear theatre.

In this regards, the logical political arguments to wage war and extralegal acts to facilitate Justice have been assumed by MOEC. MOEC will do what it takes to be successful even if such is no more than a power play.

MOEC appears to have arranged activities for Carlos the Jackal, the world's greatest terrorist. This involves state sponsorship. His arrest also involved systematic patterns of defection.

The control over the institutions of mankind predispose the fall of the Apollonian priesthood to the Dionysian cult. Such are lead in the pursuit of Artemus the Hunter in search of Dionysus to enjoy the feast of the Bacchanal.

Herein, the position of Akbar (this operation) is stated and prophesy of endtimes is addressed. Symbolically Allah can only be represented by a circle.

Shiva begins to complete the slow dance of destruction as the world is in trance of the worship of the goddess Kali. The cosmic manifestation fails as it returns in the breath of Mahavishnu.

The Book of Daniel is important in MOEC. The System of which Kings yearned to rule the earth is modelled. As a result MOEC states this system is MOEC. It is based on the systems model. This system will last forever unless eliminated to it's origin.

MOEC is in the consolidation of political tactics evolved through history. It is designed to fulfill the judgment of all men and nations, Daniel 2.13.49.

In the Book of Daniel 5.5 "In the same hour came forth fingers of a man's hand and wrote over against the candlestick upon the plaster of the King's palace and the king saw part of the hand that wrote."

A continuum of small propositions has arisen. I argue in the ideal MOEC is anti nuclear. At this time period MOEC would argue multilateral disarmament. In reality MOEC appears to have heavy involvement in nuclear events.

MOEC claims to control the system of keys and computer codes that permits a head of state to aim launch a nuclear warhead. The System of MOEC probably helped design weapons systems through University of Cambridge. The Hand, Man of MOEC (most likely the head of the law school) has seen the keys and pressed all the buttons and computer codes necessary to launch a nuclear event. Herein is an insight in how MOEC is able to manipulate high ranking officials towards homeless persons.

The totality of all staging is defection around The Hand on the ACMs.

The millennium of reciprocation with truth or as imposed by MOEC will arrange the informant ratio of Armageddon Theory. The incorrect world leadership will choose negatively in a subjective utilitarianistic manner. This is the lesser of two evils, thus increasing an escalation in a circular folly of which all are too vain to accept as reality.

The world is lead into The Feast of the Bacchanal by Artemus whom they challenge only to be slain by Artemus, hence Armageddon Theory. Here an ecumenicalist code is presented as it is throughout MOEC's presentations. An individual's identity will define in part how one will interpret such data.

Daniel 6.2, "And the King commanded and they brought those men which had accused Daniel and then cast them into the den of lions, then their children, and their wives, and the lion had mastery over them and brake their bones in the pieces of ever that came at the bottom of the den."

The corpus of Parameters as evolved from the description in the appendix develops now to incorporate now all the objects of the senses. Primarily are the colours. As given to the eyes, white and black are the first colours. PHJ are attached and also imposed over the original ten lawyers and their followers. The same process is repeated with all the secondary colours, blue, red, yellow, and so forth. Technically the sensation is based on the absorption of various frequencies by the external object, blue being the last frequency absorbed.

The phenomenon of sound occurs by the vibration of matter and being received by the tympanic membrane. There are some epistemological systems that argue such as integral to the formation of intelligence, sound quantification and the formation of symbolic thought and language.

The sense of touch is facilitated by the construction of objects in their heat, hardness, and composition. The nervous system and localization of neurons also determine sensation although the objects structure is not dependent on experience. Objects are rated for their heat, texture, and hardness.

Olfaction is the quantification of evaporated materials by nerves in the nose. Taste is the quantification of materials dissolved and detected by nerves in the mouth. All these events have third party legislated events imposed over them to defect to MOEC's advantage.

Compounds are the macro building blocks of matter. Organic life is carbon based. These complexes have other events imposed over them by Cambridge Law School. Ideas or objects of the mind, a tree house, or a book, all objects have materials that would defect back to the law school. These events undergo the construction of Parameters. There is a linkage here to Plato's Laws. All possible forms and products are non proportional outputs that are affected in the formation of the corpus.

Certain key members of MOEC take credit for all the activities that exist in the world. The mechanism of Parameters permit's these actors to project their influence through the defection model of TPSYS. The orchestrative powers of the members of the 1800s expose MOEC to be attacked permitting MOEC's defense mechanism to adapt creating new boundaries. These processes are fairly sophisticated and the origin must be discerned to prove who is responsible for what activities.

All in existence before us is a form of sense data that arrives to us to be perceived through the senses. Humans must make some judgment of the relations to the composition and quality of the data by some faculty in the brain.

All matter surrounding us exists in a physical spacetime having form and composition. Spiritual objects contain a different substance according to different theism. Being non material these spiritual particles are unique and cannot be measured as a type.

The PHJ are attached to every concept of the spirit. The Godheads and forms are also subject to having material imposed such by MOEC.

In the basic format a corpus is being formed with all the materials arranged in a specific location defined by PHJ.

Next all the materials of history, figureheads, and activities to be implemented are configured into the corpus. Spiritual pastimes of various theism are similarly affixed within the corpus. There is now no object that can come into existence, which will not bear at least secondary if not primary relationship to MOEC. If any object comes to be affected by MOEC by any subsystem it will have come under the effect of Parameters.

From the corpus of Parameters the holon receives it's body and form. The illusionary effect or mimicry of causation is a definite blaspheme against a virgin birth, an archetype, especially Christianity. The attachment of PHJ functions as a control. The corpus also functions as a law. The PHJ have numerical ratios that operate as equalizers that level the equilibrium of MOEC. Such are also used as a predicate for future events.

In review, Parameters is a boundary between PHJ and Maze.

Chronologically and at various locations one will find a corpus located across highways, doorways, gates and the like. Holons or objects must move through these locations and consequently have the effect of the corpus imposed over them. The variations of Parameters can be seen at times to be to the benefit of one person or group and to the detriment of another; the result being irrational.

There is in a cultural aspect a tar baby effect in MOEC, hence corruption of blood or ad hominem. This subjective particularity is derived from petrochemical technology, which would be as a function an attack against the Arab Muslim culture that controls these resources. There are antecedents for future acts.

There is another visualization of exponential growth presented as growing snowballs, which number seven. These objects are akin to spheres. Plato's Sphere is the direct reference. These models are sphere models containing information in a geometric graph. Hence all drug production or weapons output can be isolated in a sphere model.

Plato's Ideal State or world is the Sphere, a spiritual state. The world of our experience is a sphere. There are those that use a sphere model to analyze the equilibrium of our cultural influence. Spiritual and material outputs form the perspective of MOEC. Within Parameters, with events being affected by it's processes, one can notice the generation of MOEC's mythology with cultural historical supports.

The knowledge of MOEC may be presented logically, with models, or verbally in a rational format. Essentially such is no more than an entrapment. Much information is disguised and can be used to create confounding.

The spheres travel in orbit's or possible vectors akin to astronomy or astrology. Like other phenomena, the desire is to create a deterministic prediction of events due to an informant ratio. These events would have equifinality with Parameters as they have materials imposed over them by TPSYS as a third party legislator.

It is interesting to note that Parameters adds dimension by the addition of extraneous materials in a cultural context. There is a linkage to organic genetics in the morphology of the artificial system(s) of MOEC. If a holon has cleared Parameters such has truly entered Maze.

There is a concept of dual analysis and equifinality in the construction of the spheres. All of the subsystems operate on one another and can the boundary may be visualized similar to membranes with Control being the outermost. The spheres are unique because they pertain to a holon being in Maze but they have the effect of Parameters. There is a distinction in function, assimilation, and differentiation of the subsystems in the operations performed but they all at times share a large amount of the same features.

The desired result of these manipulations is to alter the perspective of universals that are of a natural causation and controlled by these operations. In reality this is the particularity of relative morality, a human creation. What is attempted is the invertaebration of the universe. This manner of procedure has been the object of occultism, Satanism, and so forth, as reading the Bible backwards as a ritual to counteract angels. In Parameters, one can note that organically new offspring are birthed through a hymen, not created from such. There appears to be midwife ploy of giving birth or an act of creation of something new. MOEC is a reinvention of the old and material based. Religion is it's disguise.