The concept of spirituality and philosophy are important in a fully developed presentation regarding the Irrationalist Presidents. In a perspective of whom is the observer and lawgiver, this grants an inherent right or exclusion for an actor to grant or deny a dispensation. There is a de facto set of code officers who are blackmailing behaviors from the President downward to the Citizen.
It is the immediate right and jurisdiction of the state to prosecute. The import to comprehend the nature of the system MOEC or Mobilization of Empire and Civilization to operate is extensively based on theology and philosophy that would render even a well written complaint frivolous based on the competency of the United States Federal Court system.
In degree, a discussion of Eternal Law and Absolute Rights would occur first. In theory this conspiracy was constructed from a Christian victory in a Future State. In reality the rule of law and rights have been cast aside for a system of racketeering and subjective interests of individuals. This disintegrating equilibrium is maintained by corruption and force. A totalitarian environment prevails and history is being sanitized.
For the purposes of simplicity the concept of the Social Contract was chosen due to it's History of Jurisprudence in the History of the Unites States. It's two main proponents are John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau.
The President is our Sovereign and there can only be one President leading our country under the Constitution. This gives the President whose enfranchisement was from the creation of the citizen, extraordinary duties to protect the citizen and the homeland. The Constitution does not permit the President to act in a de facto or omissive manner.
The invertaebration of The Social Contract by Rousseau has always been construed as a form of democratic tyranny. It's greatest historical example has been the Fuhrer Principle of the Third Reich. Political philosophers regarding the Unites States have basically considered Locke's 2nd Treatise on Civil Government as more pertinent to this country.
What is more integral to this issues is the planned evolution of a Perfect Dictatorship in the setting of democracy. Under these social dimensions Rousseau's work emerges as more prominent.
Book One, Chapter Seven presents the template for invertaebration. The head of state is clearly only represented by itself without substitute. The invertaebration, in order for it to be fulfilled,as must substitute a de facto or negligent figure or system of heads of states. To complete the History of the Irrationalist Presidents, a Pontius Pilate Paradigm is created from rank and file law officers whom have impunity created for them by a foreign law school. This would be Los Angeles Police Department and Cambridge Law School of the United Kingdom.
7. THE SOVEREIGN
THIS formula shows us that the act of association comprises a mutual undertaking between the public and the individuals, and that each individual, in making a contract, as we may say, with himself, is bound in a double capacity; as a member of the Sovereign he is bound to the individuals, and as a member of the State to the Sovereign. But the maxim of civil right, that no one is bound by undertakings made to himself, does not apply in this case; for there is a great difference between incurring an obligation to yourself and incurring one to a whole of which you form a part.
Attention must further be called to the fact that public deliberation, while competent to bind all the subjects to the Sovereign, because of the two different capacities in which each of them may be regarded, cannot, for the opposite reason, bind the Sovereign to itself; and that it is consequently against the nature of the body politic for the Sovereign to impose on itself a law which it cannot infringe. Being able to regard itself in only one capacity, it is in the position of an individual who makes a contract with himself; and this makes it clear that there neither is nor can be any kind of fundamental law binding on the body of the people, not even the social contract itself. This does not mean that the body politic cannot enter into undertakings with others, provided the contract is not infringed by them; for in relation to what is external to it, it becomes a simple being, an individual.
But the body politic or the Sovereign, drawing it's being wholly from the sanctity of the contract, can never bind itself, even to an outsider, to do anything derogatory to the original act, for instance, to alienate any part of itself, or to submit to another Sovereign. Violation of the act by which it exists would be self annihilation; and that which is itself nothing can create nothing.
One must consider that the Constitution creates the president as the chief manger of the system. Here we see that if the usurpation is successful we have a lower level subsystem micromanaging a component that should have had authority over the subsystem. In the United States the Attorney General is the chief law officer with the ABSOLUTE POWER to press or dismiss charges.
The beginning is everything. President Reagan, once he decisively knew that a crime was being committed had by law to act regardless of any philosophical considerations. The correct thing to do was to bring the issue to United States Attorney General, Edwin Meese III.
This issue as demonstrated has certain legal and ethical predicaments. The manifest activity of MOEC and or AKBAR begins with Reagan. Personally, after over 33 years of misfortune I do not consider the conditions during Reagan to begin to approach the disintegration of the Clinton, G. W. Bush, George W Bush, Obama, or Trump Administrations.
What the world is witnessing is the collapse of leadership by the head of state of the world's only preeminent superpower. It is clear that the United States can be blackmailed and extorted well beneath a nuclear threshold. Also critically at stake is the rule of law itself. Are there innate rights of man which even the powerful should obey? There are also serious health considerations due to the cowardly response of the Irrationalist Presidents. As the disenfranchisement of myself at the hands of these mismanagers is prima facie, it is absurd for me to develop these personalities as leaders.
Homo sapiens has not developed the repertoire to adequately meet the challenge presented at hand. Species failure is the true platform. The legitimacy of democracy is at stake. This is due to the Social Contract theory being the universally accepted model. Hence the Universal System headed by the United Nations stresses democracy and suffrage by voting to promote the leadership and Sovereign.
In the particular, the United States Constitution is under attack by alienating only one particular citizen against the legally enfranchised rights. This would be the Bill of Rights proper. I am going to posit numbers 1-9. Number ten gives rights back to the States.
The attack is upward from LAPD to the cognition of the President and all three executive branches. The rule of law is based on rights and duties and who has obligations to perform duties. Primary law are the substantive rights and secondary law are those principles and institutions used to uphold the primary law.
This invertaebration reverses the due process and places power into the hands of the police without check. The externality for this act gradually escalates. I chose my natural right to live regardless of the incompetency of the general population. This use of tacit General Will in substitution for the Constitution is no more than mob rule. Both Locke and Federalism attempt to describe and remedy this tyranny of majority and tyranny of minority with a system of checks and balances.
In the United States Here there are executive branches. The United Nations is a Collegiate system.
The external model of the Social Contract imposed over natural man has not made such good. Rousseau is adamant that this occur for civilization. Hobbes posits an argument for Absolutism, not necessarily a monarch to "keep man in awe".
An important issue to be considered and deliberated is to state "In whose interest should the government act?" A timeless discourse reinvents itself under the modern setting and social dimension. I will state that earlier models of Plato and Aristotle have a continuum and a modern reader of political philosophy or follower of media politics should familiarize themselves with the foundations of both classical Western and Eastern thought.
The Polity according to Aristotle:
One may also wish to contemplate an inquiry in to plutocracy and kleptocracy. The former is a tyranny based on the selling of small amounts of property. A Kleptocracy consists of what one steals from the people, not what one gives to the commonweal. This model has come to the fore in the wake of Mobutoism and the strife in the Congo.
Philosophy in itself or simply internally contemplating abstract ideas is not going to remedy this or any other human rights event. It may consist in the correct methodology to prepare to act. It is irrationality to fail to perform moral and legal duties.
The current time period reflects a 33 year history of manifest abuse and a huge and growing list of substitute targets being prosecuted. (December 1, 2020)
A circular folly, which is irrationalist, develops from the obstruction of justice and failure to respond. As such the system is morphogenetic or increasing in size. This model will incorporate more energy from outside it's present boundaries until something opposes such or a collapse due to it's own limitations occurs.
The emergent structure in formation is a Perfect Dictator. This is a system of a democratically elected tyranny. This may also be a system of a party. Here we see it may also be multiparty as the historical reality in the concrete has produced no positive action from the Democrat or the Republican parties.
In this aperture one has to also consider historical concepts of totalitarianism.
Totalitarianism is a police state. This is often discussed as an ideal state or an a priori model. The state exercises absolute political and social control over most or all aspects of public and private behavior. There is little regard for interests that are not aligned with perpetuating this regime and the actors who are leading such. It is this facet that lends itself to violent or arbitrary treatment without a transparent court proceeding or the right to legal person.
A totalitarian regime mobilizes it's entire population in support of the state and a dogmatic ideology. Political power and or social control are maintained through a range of measures including the use of secret police, mass surveillance, propaganda disseminated through state controlled mass media, restriction of a range of rights and freedoms including freedom of speech, and widespread use of terror tactics.
In this emergent period in the real world the absolutism of totalitarianism is manifest while the conditions of the last 33 years have been a police state with arbitrary justice. What is also an interesting dimension is the presence of chaos. This lack of organization gives an impetus to attempt to restore the original or desired equilibrium. What is without doubt is that this type of calculation is based on lifespan. A continuum or succession of power is needed to maintain homeostasis.
The entropy is concrete but it is not empirically feasible to measure every relevant diagnostic in this type of setting. Entropy concerns itself with how much energy is available to perform work. A material system does not exist in a vacuum. In a Disruption it is possible for Other systems to operate on maintaining a marginal equilibrium.
In this instance I have inferred that the entropy is high meaning that this event as seen should reach it's longevity. I will state this only for the manifest structure. There is a tremendous latent potential that is planned. This would then be conspiracy for the sake of simplicity.
Barack Obama is the Singularity Target.
Bhakta David Nollmeyer is the Singularity Experiment.
The parameters of the MOEC as a system are undefined. They are contingent on creating and maintaining a culture of a power structure that will sustain it. In this regards it is parasitic on the legitimate structures of society. It is draining the benefit created by legitimate work and thinking.
In close of this small opening discourse is to posit the manifest breach which targeted the head of state, President Reagan and the Constitution via a private citizen it should have protected myself, Bhakta David Nollmeyer.
President Reagan had no choice but to report this event to then Attorney General Meese or declare a state of emergency and go public to stop the abuse from spreading. As a result history proved that President Reagan and his subsequent following presidents are impotent and corrupt as are the persons that fulfilled the office of United States Attorney General.
In lieu of this the system expands. The universal system headed by the United Nations has received numerous complaints detailing abuse as well as being the last resort of over 26 United States Federal Court suits which were to reread as criminal.
The concept of administrative procedure descending from the presidency into levels of both lower public and private managers in the abstract is not incorrect in degree but there is NO LEADERSHIP. THERE ARE NO FOLLOWERS. CHAOS AND DISORGANIZATION PREVAIL. A THEORY CALLED DEINDIVIDUATION APPEARS TO HELP EXPLAIN THE THE LACK OF CONSCIENCE IN THE POPULATION WRIT LARGE.
The crime should be prosecuted to it's origin. The historical equilibrium posited George W. Bush attempting to define his legacy within Homeland Security. The whole Perfect Dictatorship of then four Irrationalist Presidents is so spurious that a cult of personality and plutocracy has emerged. The only serious managers to be chastised are CEOs of the great multinationals and transnationals.
The lack of cognitive individual and collective intelligence and the replacement of the citizen with a huge population of ritualistic informants is the basis for the purge that is in continuo. There is no argument to support these presidents. The Damage is Concrete.
The manifest censorship that began June 17,1987, inaugurates a System of the Perfect Dictator. Further revelation is that an Alter Ego construct is intended to parallel Joseph Stalin of the now defunct USSR. The censorship of the media which continues in continuo mocks any legitimate attempt to present Ronald Reagan against accurate history. The Scorched Earth is also not quantified if it ever will be.
The history of law enforcement will also attack the sustainability of the three executive branches of government: Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branches.
Mobilization of Empire and Civilization
MOEC is an acronym which stands for Mobilization of Empire and Civilization. Is is a suprasystem that manages two subsystems Lycurgus and Akbar.
The following is part of a copy written piece that recapitulates the beginning of Akbar. Lycurgus is the stage before Akbar.
As seen some of the terminology is unique to MOEC and one would need the whole text to familiarize oneself for maximum comprehension.
Myth of the Contemporary Man
In recapitulation, at the beginning of Lycurgus, I witnessed the administration of MOEC to the cognition of President Reagan, Vice President Bush, and then Senator Dole. The event spread to Prime Minister Thatcher of the United Kingdom and Gorbachev of the USSR. Other notables to be exposed first include Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua as well as Ayatollah Khomeini, Yasser Arafat, and Augostino Pinochet to name a few of the extant movers of the political world. This event occurred over television over regular programming live. These officials may be heard reciprocating with voices in the background as to the nature of my plight. This concept of synchronicity was implemented as convergent totalitarianism in Maze learning.
A small primer of basics of constitutions, theory, and the probable response of head of states was delivered to myself. The same material was delivered to these world leaders. Overall the head of state brief, the superior datum was delivered again to myself, peripheral materials to the leaders. The experiment is deigned to gauge the effectiveness of government to move on a crime and reconcile the event.
The brief is a mixed complex of constitutional and unconstitutional events. The postulation being such, that the citizenship is safer and stronger than criminality. The format includes theism, philosophy, positive law, individuals, and collectives. The disinformation is quite intensive founded on relativity and utilitarianism to laws.
The Censorship has rendered a whole History to date which is impotent. It shall be revised and strongly criticized. For an individual or writer of history, a total generation of thought has been systematically wrecked.
This concept of wrecking involved the will to order and threshold learning. A reductionist concept of logic is used to distill arguments to their most potent form. An individual is presented an intelligence battery from a composite of over 500 college majors. This battery was developed by Cambridge Law School. The material is mostly moral and resembles the type of reasoning that judges use in constitutional courts in deciding cases.
At threshold, the individual as he fails tasks is given more tasks to answer. A constitutional position is stronger than a criminal position in the ordering of social systems. The conservation of constitutional positions is unalienable. This position should create security and safety in the individual plus collective. In the minimum it is stoic.
The model allows TPSYS to test a person under a flood of datum and entrapments involving abstraction or particulars. The most particular cases are persons with a threat of murder against themselves. As the individual becomes confused, one tends to secure oneself through violence forming groups to do such in a texture of culture.
The person as described does not order oneself and institutions in a polity. On the contrary, he wrecks the model state. The choices a person makes are taped and used in the future to implement legal and extralegal events against the individual.
As discussed in Origin the entire morphology evolved from the Reductionist Room.
The reductionist model reflects the esse, sid qou esse, and sid quo esse model describing Christian Final Judgment. The reduction of every intent to values then permits an antecedent to create a stock of criminalized datum in hiearchializing crimes against persons and property in a future state.
There is an array of common or civil law precedent to proceed with moralization of the judgment as these activities occur in a localized place and time. The most serious events appear to be murders with a parallelist structure; there is complicity within the state. The abuses are documented to create propaganda and other events. This is usually escalated.
The territoriality and individual may be brought under control by war. This is the court of last resort. Acts then may be fought with conventional weapons. Armageddon or EWS scenarios frame the problematic as lesser events build to support and change these models.
To return towards the beginning, if a person commits a crime, one is obligated by the efficient law of constitutions to turn oneself in; no flight is moral. Various crimes for a reductionist purpose, drug use, theft, assault, and murder are arranged around one as an antecedent in a social system s format. A person is then asked what one's moral perspective is regarding each point. MOEC as a judge dispenses it's agents to operate based on these values.
If the amount of drugs, threats, violence, or victims, increase, the guilt is equal to the injury no more, this equal protection and weighted law. The degree of premeditation, the instruments used by the criminal and flight also increase culpability. A spatiality is defined that is the boundary of the crime. The concept of equivalence is very complex. When is a robbery able to yield the same prison time as an assault? This entails crime against property versus crimes against persons. A very simple procedure is simply to count, measure, and time the event till its terminus yielding objective comparison.
Concretely what has occurred from the Reductionist Room is a morphology of a state based on the radiation of crime as law in the place of moral precept.
The two lawyers are the imitation of a father to son revelation which is religion. The disciples are targeted crime victims. The morphology of the inverted polity develops as the persons use crimes as means to reconcile their dilemmas. The process is radiated and escalated through genealogy "I see another law in my members." This technically is the law of fomes. In Christianity, generated by the fall of the devil, there is an operation to create a contrary line of authority through descendency. These materials comprise the germ of cultural warfare, an Antichrist Mythology beneath official lines of mythology.
To complete the argument of a pure field of entities, living persons (as well as dead) form monads, dyads, and tryads, that reflect a position of universality arbitrariness. As stated, if all persons were pure it would not matter for their cultural identities and biological taxonomies regardless of such all persons would be Christians or socialists.
This method of interlocking sets yields to infinity and are judged as antecedents to future entrapments. Logical theorem were the model used the result is wrecking. No super group of individuals in a collective that does not bear differentiation based on this reductionist model exists.
At the present time these groups form the support for Lycurgus. The radiation of events in the mind appears as a cat of nine tails, fasces, an exploding cluster bomb, or a quasar in a cosmos model. All such models are used anthropomorphically.