In the continuum of United States history one of the most prominent aspects in the direction of this nation is the legacy of the president. Since June 17, 1987 manifest censorship has attempted to sanitize the real trajectory of events in continuo. This would include the records of:

Irrationalist Presidents

	Ronald Reagan
	George HW Bush
	William Clinton
	George W Bush
	Barack Obama
	Donald Trump
	Joe Biden

On this date law enforcement agents in Los Angeles Police Department usurped their positions in effect hostaging then President Ronald Reagan whom hesitated to act lending to the creation of the alienation of a private citizen to attack the United States Constitution.

Irrationalism is a form of ideology that proceeds from premises that cannot be proved. It can also be based on a folk state. This can be love of the soil or a building block for ethnic nationalism.

The United States Constitution creates a citizen first and then a president. Hence the office is duty bound to uphold the rights of all. Three executive branches are created. They are the executive, legislative, and judicial branches.

What is manifest is the isolation of a citizen de facto from one's constitutional life. This in the proper is the enfranchisement of one's primary rights, or the first nine rights as enumerated in the Bill of Rights. The tenth right simply defers certain rights back to the states. The secondary law was created to uphold the primary law which has precedence. Here Irrationality develops as the above named supra, have failed in their duty as the First Citizen to uphold the rule instead choosing their own interest disguised as the will of the majority. This immediately invokes the spectre of Jean Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract. At hand is the classic case of man's individual liberty versus the reign of the civil state. The sovereign is the legal and moral collective. The General Will is the incorporation of the collective nation's will into the state as an artificial corporate person. Here the invertaebration of the General Will from the exposition.

BOOK II

1. THAT SOVEREIGNTY IS INALIENABLE

I hold then that Sovereignty, being nothing less than the exercise of the general will, can never be alienated, and that the Sovereign, who is no less than a collective being, cannot be represented except by himself: the power indeed may be transmitted, but not the will.

We can see from this that the sovereign power, absolute, sacred and inviolable as it is, does not and cannot exceed the limits of general conventions, and that every man may dispose at will of such goods and liberty as these conventions leave him; so that the Sovereign never has a right to lay more charges on one subject than on another, because, in that case, the question becomes particular,and ceases to be within it's competency.

Further:

5. THE RIGHT OF LIFE AND DEATH

THE question is often asked how individuals, having no right to dispose of their own lives, can transfer to the Sovereign a right which they do not possess. The difficulty of answering this question seems to me to lie in it's being wrongly stated. Every man has a right to risk his own life in order to preserve it. Has it ever been said that a man who throws himself out of the window to escape from a fire is guilty of suicide? Has such a crime ever been laid to the charge of him who perishes in a storm because, when he went on board, he knew of the danger?

The social treaty has for it's end the preservation of the contracting parties. He who wills the end wills the means also, and the means must involve some risks, and even some losses. He who wishes to preserve his life at others' expense should also, when it is necessary, be ready to give it up for their sake. Furthermore, the citizen is no longer the judge of the dangers to which the law desires him to expose himself; and when the prince says to him: "It is expedient for the State that you should die," he ought to die, because it is only on that condition that he has been living in security up to the present, and because his life is no longer a mere bounty of nature, but a gift made conditionally by the State.

We must not be frivolous; political philosophy and self preservation are what is laying waste with the positive law reigning as as the controlling suprasystem as gentle abstract turned into battering ram of shrapnel as incompetence and corruption. The inviolable constitution or compact turns now to be identical to the interest of leader. This is a Fuhrer Principle when wrought out of it's true nature and ends which is the preservation of Justice for the individual and collective by the power of the state. It may also be a system of leaders as is the present case a Perfect Dictatorship.

It is evident at the present in continuo that any president elected is no more than a democratically elected tyrant.

The president is created from the citizen and is the caretaker of the rights and duties of such in type and kind. It does not predispose any tyranny of majority or minority as a person or partisan party system to usurp these right to advance or preserve their reign on power. Herein a classical circular folly emerges as a Racketeered Influenced Corrupt Organization.

John Locke writes:

Sect. 172. Thirdly, Despotical power is an absolute, arbitrary power one man has over another, to take away his life, whenever he pleases. This is a power, which neither nature gives, for it has made no such distinction between one man and another; nor compact can convey: for man not having such an arbitrary power over his own life, cannot give another man such a power over it; but it is the effect only of forfeiture, which the aggressor makes of his own life, when he puts himself into the state of war with another: for having quitted reason, which God hath given to be the rule betwixt man and man, and the common bond whereby human kind is united into one fellowship and society; and having renounced the way of peace which that teaches, and made use of the force of war, to compass his unjust ends upon another, where he has no right; and so revolting from his own kind to that of beasts, by making force, which is theirs, to be his rule of right, he renders himself liable to be destroyed by the injured person, and the rest of mankind, that will join with him in the execution of justice, as any other wild beast, or noxious brute, with whom mankind can have neither society nor security*. And thus captives, taken in a just and lawful war, and such only, are subject to a despotical power, which, as it arises not from compact, so neither is it capable of any, but is the state of war continued: for what compact can be made with a man that is not master of his own life? What condition can he perform? And if he be once allowed to be master of his own life, the despotical, arbitrary power of his master ceases. He that is master of himself, and his own life, has a right too to the means of preserving it; so that as soon as compact enters, slavery ceases, and he so far quits his absolute power, and puts an end to the state of war, who enters into conditions with his captive.

(*Another copy corrected by Mr. Locke, has it thus, Noxious brute that is destructive to their being.)

Correctly speaking the state of nature or the model of governance that posits man in his natural state in his natural environment is reverted to a play of power and arbitrary treatment. As seen the Constitution and Bill of Rights can only exist as such exist in an ordered and ruled civil state hence The Social Contract Theory. What exists to date in continuo is that state of war, todo a todo, or every one against everyone. Here the individual has very few resources in the artificial state that was created to help preserve what natural rights we possess as human and as well as what may be strengthened. The state begins to systematically alienate one individual while aiming the general population as informants to attack this person to save themselves as a legitimate expression of the rule of law.

This is the tyranny of the majority.

As the individual attempts to be motile to retreat to defensible territory the pursuit by impugn de facto levels of the state apparatus pursue. In this manner they expand their attack on the remaining citizens and territory. They blame the fleeing citizen. The lower informants that yield to the siren call of the higher informants are criminal.

Comment: This site will continually updated. Each president will receive his own page.

Censorship and Sanitization of Chemical Assault Scorched Earth in the USA

On June 17, 1987 Los Angeles Police Department California, LAPD launched a preemptive attack against then President Ronald Reagan. I was in Dover, Delaware. This attack alienated my natural person from my United States Citizenship and Bill of Right protections.

The allegation is the Cambridge Law School is the authorship or Proximate Cause sine qua non.

The resultant action has created a Crime Against Humanity and Treason Against the United States and United Kingdom.

The algorithm of the operation is:

1. United Kingdom: Cambridge Law School, Scotland Yard

2. United States: California: Los Angeles Police Department, Delaware: Delaware State Police, Local Jurisdictions

The principals, accessories, and accomplices extend to further local jurisdictions, organizations, and individuals in a Storyboard Reverse Sting.

The actual name of this structure and process is Mobilization of Empire and Civilization or MOEC.

Origin, is the General User Interface GUI. It was presented as the Organic Cell. I regard Origin as the Artificial Virus. MOEC is Cambridge Law School's most efficient attempt to organize or systematize Mobilization of Empire and Civilization. It is a novelty of Prisoner's Dilemma. At this time period in history it is the most powerful defection model operating in the post WWII era in continuo. It is claimed that Cambridge Law School authors the mechanism that expands and contracts the United Kingdom or British Empire. As seen MOEC has entrapped and severely damaged the posterity of the sworn officials whom it denotes as the Irrationalist Presidents:

It has also severely damaged the future of Prince Charles or the Duke of Cambridge, his son William from having a reign on the British Crown without serious issues. The defection model has created a censorship and sanitization of 8 billion persons worldwide.

On September 16, 2013 the United Nations issued a report stating that there was strong evidence that nerve agent Sarin was used in the suburbs near Damascus on August 21, 2013.

This action has occurred while the United States has operated a Chemical Assault Scorched Earth Program that is exclusively centered over my natural person.

I was in Westwood, California.

On October 1, 2013 UN Inspectors have arrived in Syria to dismantle Syria's Chemical Warfare Program.

The areas of California that are most affected by MOEC, Mobilization of Empire and Civilization are Plumas, Lassen, Siskiyou, and Modoc Counties. Inclusive are Inyo, Mono, Riverside and East County near the Salton Sea and Colorado River.These areas are rural and quite large. Organizationally these counties are interfaces with very large National Forests and deserts; as such they are prone to wildfires. They are without a doubt the most remote areas left in the state of California and were designed as was Inyo County to bear the brunt off any protracted stand down that would occur between myself and federal and state government.

A model used in the attack is an alter ego component and perspective that is based on transformations between Stalinist USSR and the United States. The Soviet Union is the standard paradigm used to study modern totalitarianism (1900+). This approach is a very solid and will be very difficult to refute. This perspective is based on the formation of the Oprichniki during Ivan the Terrible. In Russia, this secret police department swept through the countryside dressed in black on horseback with brooms and with heads of dogs mounted on their saddles. The Boyers and other members of the leading classes sought security underneath the Oprichniki rather than oppose them.

This structure is argued as the beginning of the Russian Mafia and the KGB.

The Allegation here is that Cambridge Law School has created the Anglo American Oprichniki and authored a Crime Against Humanity and Treason against the United States and United Kingdom.

Hence in this perspective the principals attack upward is a stepladder movement the then downward as part of the reverse sting.

MOEC is essentially a Gay Militia with a repertoire of homosexual blackmail, extortion, hostaging, and intimidation of a witness ring. In the United States MOEC would form a RICO Enterprise. RICO is TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 96, Section 1961 of the United States Code.

There are then sworn and unsworn informants. At issue are the response from duty bound officials to the recruitment of informants as stalkers. Here the emphasis is on crime against persons. Under Due Process and Equal Protection crimes against persons should be prioritized first before property crimes.

The Social Contract Theory is the correct model in modern constitutional theory and is accepted in practice worldwide. Since my rights have been alienated by an attack by homosexual or MSM (Men who have sex with Men) actors, I have been forced to survive while an epistemological attack on my natural person has been condoned by the American Presidents identified supra. The MSM officers of LAPD are organized as a Gay Militia with various nom de guerras.

Overall Cambridge is using an eclectic dialectical line derived from Greek Tyrannies and an ideological line derived from Plato to Marx. Hence archetypal patterns have been inverted and artificially embedded in the Paradigm of Laws:

In LAPD they have entrapped a cell of MSM officers in a cell that have operated with the code names of:

Under a Tournament challenge it was posited that under Gay Relativity and Phenomenology, LAPD would be able to morally justify an attack on my person. This would necessitate a Positive Self Defense. The use of an Attorney General Exception necessitates that such an order exists and a sitting president has signed such. Under positive law a justification would involve concepts as the Castle Doctrine meaning that actors would need to prove a threat upon themselves. Who has attacked them? I am not the belligerent they are provocateurs. In continuation, if they are under the color of law they have no legal right to operate an attack out of the LAPD station house. Hence this develops the emergence of Gay Irrationalism Gay Know Nothing. This is reductio ad absurdium. This is a clear circular folly.

The analogy here to the Greek Decathlon where a performer needs not only to be physically, spiritually and intellectually fit has become has become a colossal hoax.

This attack against the human race was designed to entrap the United Kingdom, United States, California and LAPD. It also has a strategic mission of Gay or Same Sex Marriage.

MOEC is in part analogous to the popular film The Wizard of Oz. It is indeed the highest level Prisoner's Dilemma defection model operating in the world at this time. It is a Trojan Horse Undermining the United States through a Divorce Program which is designed in the opposite as a Yellow Brick Road Marriage Program.

Marriage is a near universal for all adults. The Divorce Rate is now near 45% nationwide.

The grandfather is considered the Patriarch of the family. My observations and research have found no response whatsoever locally or in the United States

A 75 year old grandfather may have a 50 year old son. The son may have a 25 year old son. The 25 year old son may have a one year old son. The grandfather has seen his great grandson.

The 25 year old son clearly has witnessed an epic in World and American History as an adult. He clearly has a strong possibility of legally incriminating Barack Obama. From 2013, in twenty five years Obama will be 77 years old.

The same issue stands for the female gender consideration.

What is the historical and legal inheritance of families in this area, America, and the World?

Tournament

The provocation of LAPD is formed as a Tournament. As seen the entire culture is Undermined. At issue are a correct historical and legal response. There is a very serious rivalry between the Gay Militia and myself. Periander, The Fly, and Dodo are the operatives of Cambridge Law School. Their system of complicity will create the worst persons and United Kingdom and United States History. This hub and node conspiracy is the Yellow Brick Road.

Dodo has been attempting to posit Exclusive Homosexuality. The two persons a female named Chris from Delaware and male name Chris from California. I personally know both natural persons. At times in a fallacy of changing the argument and false sets they are argued as abstractions or groups.

This is a key insight. These persons are being attacked. Northern California, Salton Sea to Blythe, and Inyo County, California are being exposed to this action. The female from Delaware is being attacked denoting severe misogyny. One endgame sub line concerns which of the jurisdictions above may trigger her legal action against the United States and LAPD.

To date no LGBTi leaders, sworn officials, or actors of any discretion have stepped forward specifically from the Eastern High Sierras.

MOEC Studies is only an Approach but is by far and beyond the most direct and organized attempt to decapitate and prosecute MOEC.

This attack is paired to Gay Marriage. It is absurd to argue that just by being Same Sex that is one is qualified. I would not be so incompetent to believe the opposite that simply because LGBTi officers are operating a Gay Militia that heterosexuality qualifies one alone due to victimization.

The scripting is very blatant. One should leave a clear and unambiguous record of one's intents and acts if they are desiring merit based promotion or to defend themselves from spurious and dubious attacks as is the case here.

This Tryad Cohort Rivalry between Dodo, Obama, and myself is a watershed event in World History. The censorship and sanitization of 8 billion persons defines MOEC as a Cultural Singularity opposing Technological Singularity.

Under these conditions of despotic repression I have organized MOEC Studies into an Approach. This is the strongest attempt at systematic decapitation of this criminal enterprise.

The hiring of ex Homeland Secretary Janet Napolitano at the University of California closes texture on converting the State into the evolving Machinery of Torture. Cambridge, the University of California, and the Nobel Organization will form an aperture to attack those so called academics and world experts who are abetting a Crime Against Humanity and Treason against their home country.

Cultural Singularity Versus Technological Singularity

MOEC is a preemptive attack on Technological Singularity. This structure and process is designed to create a suboptimal equilibrium for AI technology as it emerges with accelerating speed through history. More can be read here:

Fascism

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In it's day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom and bust prone liberal capitalism, with it's alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with it's violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism blood and soil for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society's economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the national interest that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.

Fascism is to be distinguished from interventionism, or the mixed economy. Interventionism seeks to guide the market process, not eliminate it, as fascism did. Minimum wage and antitrust laws, though they regulate the free market, are a far cry from multiyear plans from the Ministry of Economics.

Under fascism, the state, through official cartels, controlled all aspects of manufacturing, commerce, finance, and agriculture. Planning boards set product lines, production levels, prices, wages, working conditions, and the size of firms. Licensing was ubiquitous; no economic activity could be undertaken without government permission. Levels of consumption were dictated by the state, and excess incomes had to be surrendered as taxes or loans. The consequent burdening of manufacturers gave advantages to foreign firms wishing to export. But since government policy aimed at autarky, or national self sufficiency, protectionism was necessary: imports were barred or strictly controlled, leaving foreign conquest as the only avenue for access to resources unavailable domestically. Fascism was thus incompatible with peace and the international division of labor hallmarks of liberalism.

Fascism embodied corporatism, in which political representation was based on trade and industry rather than on geography. In this, fascism revealed it's roots in syndicalism, a form of socialism originating on the left. The government cartelized firms of the same industry, with representatives of labor and management serving on myriad local, regional, and national boards subject always to the final authority of the dictator's economic plan. Corporatism was intended to avert unsettling divisions within the nation, such as lockouts and union strikes. The price of such forced harmony was the loss of the ability to bargain and move about freely.

To maintain high employment and minimize popular discontent, fascist governments also undertook massive public works projects financed by steep taxes, borrowing, and fiat money creation. While many of these projects were domestic roads, buildings, stadiums the largest project of all was militarism, with huge armies and arms production.

The fascist leaders' antagonism to communism has been misinterpreted as an affinity for capitalism. In fact, fascists' anticommunism was motivated by a belief that in the collectivist milieu of early twentieth century Europe, communism was it's closest rival for people's allegiance. As with communism, under fascism, every citizen was regarded as an employee and tenant of the totalitarian, party dominated state. Consequently, it was the state's prerogative to use force, or the threat of it, to suppress even peaceful opposition.

If a formal architect of fascism can be identified, it is Benito Mussolini, the onetime Marxist editor who, caught up in nationalist fervor, broke with the left as World War I approached and became Italy's leader in 1922. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the antisocial right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with it's corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. (p. 280)

Before his foray into imperialism in 1935, Mussolini was often praised by prominent Americans and Britons, including Winston Churchill, for his economic program.

Similarly, Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist (Nazi) Party adapted fascism to Germany beginning in 1933, said:

The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain it's right to control the owners of property. (Barkai 1990, pp. 26–27)

Both nations exhibited elaborate planning schemes for their economies in order to carry out the state's objectives. Mussolini's corporate state "consider[ed] private initiative in production the most effective instrument to protect national interests" (Basch 1937, p. 97). But the meaning of initiative differed significantly from it's meaning in a market economy. Labor and management were organized into twenty two industry and trade corporations, each with Fascist Party members as senior participants. The corporations were consolidated into a National Council of Corporations; however, the real decisions were made by state agencies such as the Instituto per la Ricosstruzione Industriale, which held shares in industrial, agricultural, and real estate enterprises, and the Instituto Mobiliare, which controlled the nation's credit.

Hitler's regime eliminated small corporations and made membership in cartels mandatory. The Reich Economic Chamber was at the top of a complicated bureaucracy comprising nearly two hundred organizations organized along industry, commercial, and craft lines, as well as several national councils. The Labor Front, an extension of the Nazi Party, directed all labor matters, including wages and assignment of workers to particular jobs. Labor conscription was inaugurated in 1938. Two years earlier, Hitler had imposed a four year plan to shift the nation's economy to a war footing. In Europe during this era, Spain, Portugal, and Greece also instituted fascist economies.

In the United States, beginning in 1933, the constellation of government interventions known as the New Deal had features suggestive of the corporate state. The National Industrial Recovery Act created code authorities and codes of practice that governed all aspects of manufacturing and commerce. The National Labor Relations Act made the federal government the final arbiter in labor issues. The Agricultural Adjustment Act introduced central planning to farming. The object was to reduce competition and output in order to keep prices and incomes of particular groups from falling during the Great Depression.

It is a matter of controversy whether President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal was directly influenced by fascist economic policies. Mussolini praised the New Deal as "boldly... interventionist in the field of economics," and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his "honest purpose of restoring Italy" and acknowledged that he kept "in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman." Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione's pro Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator.

The Informant and the Fall of the United States

It is prima facie that the United States is undergoing an in continuo Chemical Assault Scorched Earth. This is facilitated by recruiting Informants along a career defection path. This is inclusive of having a faith, family, and job. In this instance I have argued that MSM Cambridge Lawyers are the Authorship and Proximate Cause. The individual exists first in nature. The family has been argued as the basis of the collective government.

The correct Due Process is to legally decapitate this RICO Criminal Enterprise to the Origin. In this instance MOEC is homosexual blackmail, intimidation, hostaging, and extortion ring. In LDCs as Mexico the extortion of money and property is common, GDCs as the United States quid pro quos as career and academic rigging as being a doctor are prominent. Education is the long term solution and punishment is the short term solution.

Barack Obama is the Singularity Target and Bhakta David is the Singularity Experiment. In this regard I am diametrically opposing MOEC and organizing MOEC Studies to seat a War Crime Tribunal.Every individual and collective should be opposed to MOEC. This attack is radiating outward from the United States, specifically LAPD, California. This is damaging all nations and peoples.

You are being Numbered for formal and informal punishment in a Reverse Sting.

Identifying the Names of the Authorship

TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

PART I - CRIMES

CHAPTER 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES

§ 2381. Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

§ 2382. Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

An important component of Justice is to identify the perpetrators. The victim has the right to confront one's perpetrators. This public disclosure also has a deterrent effect on future aggressors. There is tremendous damage to individuals and families in the United States. I am acting strongly to positively identify and criminal actors. The State has the right to press criminal charges. Here the culture of impunity, censorship, and sanitization also is detrimental to the human race and individual nationstates.

MOEC Studies is the only known direct response to the in continuo actions in the United States and the world.

What to Do

It is imperative that persons begin to file complaints to the competent authorities. Under the Color of Law against code enforcement in the main are handled by the FBI. There is a contact for Under the Color of authority complaints at their website.